[Ultimate] Time for ultimate - Cubberly or Seale?
Eric Verploegen
ericverp at stanford.edu
Tue Mar 10 11:13:22 PDT 2009
eric is in
2009/3/10 kami shahi <kami12 at yahoo.com>
> I like Cubberly better as well - see you guys at 12:15 (ish).
>
> kami
>
> --- On *Tue, 3/10/09, Matthew Stringer <mstringer at depomed.com>* wrote:
>
> From: Matthew Stringer <mstringer at depomed.com>
> Subject: RE: [Ultimate] Time for ultimate - Cubberly or Seale?
> To: "Roland Smith" <rsmith at csaengineering.com>, "kami shahi" <
> kami12 at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "ultimate at grommit.com" <ultimate at grommit.com>
> Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 10:55 AM
>
>
> I’m in. I’m no executive, but let’s do Cubberley for today as long as
> it doesn’t rule out any players.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
> [image: Depomed Logo]
> *
> Matthew Stringer*
> ***Staffing Manager
>
> Depomed, Inc
> *1360 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025
> T 650.462.5900 | F 650.462.9993
> mstringer at depomed.com
> http://www.depomed.com
>
> * We Believe:*
> - In personal and professional integrity.
> - In our obligation to build shareholder value.
> - In our mandate to improve patient lives.
> - In driving innovation and embracing change.
> - That our success is linked to our ability to hire, develop, and reward
> the best people.
> - In shared responsibility and personal accountability.
> - In thorough planning and precise execution.
>
> *The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer. [DMIX92]*
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* ultimate-bounces at grommit.com [mailto:ultimate-bounces at grommit.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Roland Smith
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:27 AM
> *To:* kami shahi
> *Cc:* ultimate at grommit.com; ultimate-bounces at grommit.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Ultimate] Time for ultimate - Cubberly or Seale?
>
>
>
>
> 2 from CSA, plus Scott from Loral. I like the Cubberly field a bit more,
> but if Seale is more convenient we can do that. Someone should make the
> executive decision soon though.
>
> Roland Smith
> Engineer
> CSA Engineering
> 650 210 9000 x276
>
> *kami shahi <kami12 at yahoo.com>*
> Sent by: ultimate-bounces at grommit.com
>
> 03/10/2009 10:22 AM
>
> To
>
> ultimate at grommit.com
>
> cc
>
>
>
> Subject
>
> [Ultimate] Time for ultimate - Cubberly or Seale?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're back in business with all this sunshine! I'm in, who else?
>
> Should we play at Cubberly or Seale? I'm guessing either one can take the
> abuse but Seale seems to be more convenient for most people...
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Kami
> _______________________________________________
> Ultimate mailing list
> Ultimate at grommit.com
> http://grommit.com/mailman/listinfo/ultimate
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ultimate mailing list
> Ultimate at grommit.com
> http://grommit.com/mailman/listinfo/ultimate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://grommit.com/pipermail/ultimate/attachments/20090310/b8d05f83/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2610 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://grommit.com/pipermail/ultimate/attachments/20090310/b8d05f83/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the Ultimate
mailing list